Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Select multiple courts at once.
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Provisional Bank Account Attachment Under CGST Section 83 Lapses Automatically After One Year Without Extension</h1> HC ruled that provisional attachment of bank account under Section 83 of CGST Act automatically ceased after one year from the original order date. ... Provisional attachment under Section 83 of the CGST Act - Mandatory one-year cessation of provisional attachment - Extension of provisional attachment requiring decision by competent authority - Right of revenue to initiate action in accordance with law despite cessationProvisional attachment under Section 83 of the CGST Act - Mandatory one-year cessation of provisional attachment - Extension of provisional attachment requiring decision by competent authority - Provisional attachment effected by order dated 19.05.2023 ceased to have effect on expiry of one year from that date - HELD THAT: - Subsection (2) of Section 83 of the CGST Act is couched in mandatory terms that every provisional attachment shall cease to have effect after expiry of one year from the date of the order. The Court held that, in the absence of any decision by a competent authority to extend the period of provisional attachment, internal departmental correspondence does not sustain continuation of the attachment. Applying the statutory mandate to the impugned order dated 19.05.2023, the provisional attachment stands terminated on expiry of one year from that date. The Court expressly left open the respondents' ability to take further action against the petitioner in accordance with law notwithstanding the cessation of the provisional attachment. [Paras 7, 8]Impugned provisional attachment order dated 19.05.2023 ceased to have effect on expiry of one year from its date; respondents may nevertheless take action as permitted by law.Final Conclusion: Writ petition disposed of by holding that the provisional attachment dated 19.05.2023 ceased to have effect after one year; no costs; respondents remain free to take any lawful action thereafter. Issues: Challenge to provisional attachment of bank account under Section 83 of the CGST Act.In this judgment delivered by the High Court, the challenge was against the order of provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner argued that the order, dated 19.05.2023, provisionally attaching their bank account should be set aside as it had lost its effect after one year, as per Sub-section (2) of Section 83 of the CGST Act. The respondent, however, failed to extend the provisional attachment within the stipulated time frame. The court examined the mandatory language of the provision, which clearly stated that the provisional attachment ceases to have effect after one year from the date of the order. Consequently, the court held that the provisional attachment order dated 19.05.2023 ceased to have effect after the expiry of one year. The judgment clarified that this decision does not prevent the respondents from taking lawful action against the petitioner. As a result, the Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs, and any pending interlocutory applications were also closed.