1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court Explores Whether Resolution Professionals Under Insolvency Code Are Public Servants Under Corruption Act.</h1> The court addressed whether a Resolution Professional under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code qualifies as a public servant under the Prevention of ... Public servant, under the Prevention of Corruption Act - Resolution Professional under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is to be considered as a public servant or not - HELD THAT:- Issue notice, returnable in four weeks. Issues involved:1. Consideration of a Resolution Professional under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code as a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act.Detailed Analysis:1. The main issue before the court was whether a Resolution Professional under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code should be considered a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The counsel for the petitioner argued that this question required consideration, highlighting that a similar issue was pending before the court in another case. The Court acknowledged the significance of this matter and decided to issue notice on the issue, with a returnable date set for four weeks.2. During the proceedings, it was brought to the Court's attention that the complainant, represented by Mr. Ram Niwas Buri, was a party in the proceedings before the High Court. As a result, the complainant was ordered to be impleaded as respondent No.2 in the case. This procedural step was taken to ensure all relevant parties were included in the legal proceedings and had the opportunity to present their arguments before the Court.Overall, the judgment focused on the specific legal question of whether a Resolution Professional falls within the definition of a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Court's decision to issue notice on this issue and implead the complainant as a respondent demonstrates a commitment to thorough and fair legal proceedings, ensuring all relevant parties are heard before a final decision is reached.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
