Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned assessment order confirming reversal of input tax credit on the basis of mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A was liable to be set aside and remitted for fresh consideration in the light of the subsequent GST circular.
Analysis: The dispute arose from variations between the input tax credit claimed in GSTR-3B and the auto-populated credit in GSTR-2A. A subsequent Board circular provided the procedure for verification of ITC mismatch under Section 16(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, including the calling for supporting certificates depending on the quantum of difference. The circular also stated that it would apply to ongoing proceedings and to adjudication or appeal proceedings still pending. In view of that instruction and the nature of the dispute, the existing order was found unsuitable to be sustained without reconsideration under the circular.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the respondent for fresh orders after applying the circular to the facts of the case.
Ratio Decidendi: A subsequent departmental circular governing verification of input tax credit mismatch can be applied in pending adjudication matters, and an assessment order passed without such consideration may be set aside and remitted for fresh decision.