Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the relevant assessment year was time-barred and, if so, whether the consequential proceedings and orders were liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The appeal was decided by following the binding view of the jurisdictional High Court on the same issue. The notice under section 148 was issued for an assessment year governed by the earlier limitation regime, and the Court accepted that the notice was beyond time. The revenue's reliance on the COVID-19 extension was not accepted in view of the controlling precedents relied upon.
Conclusion: The notice under section 148 was held to be time-barred, and the consequential proceedings and orders were quashed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A reassessment notice issued beyond the permissible limitation period is invalid and all proceedings founded on such notice must be quashed.