Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Delhi HC directs NCLAT Chairperson to examine viability of recording proceedings before NCLT benches and NCLAT</h1> The Delhi HC disposed of a petition seeking directions for recording proceedings before NCLT benches and NCLAT. The court requested the NCLAT Chairperson ... Recordal of tribunal proceedings - live-streaming and recording of judicial proceedings - provision of transcripts and certified recordings - administrative competence of tribunals to implement procedural reforms - judicial restraint in issuing systemic directions against tribunals - rejection of overbroad writ prayersRecordal of tribunal proceedings - live-streaming and recording of judicial proceedings - provision of transcripts and certified recordings - administrative competence of tribunals to implement procedural reforms - Writ petition to be treated as a representation to the Chairperson, NCLAT, for examination of viability of directions relating to recording, preservation and dissemination of NCLT/NCLAT proceedings. - HELD THAT: - The Court declined to issue systemic directions itself and instead treated the writ petition as a representation to be placed before the Hon'ble Chairperson, NCLAT, for consideration. The Court observed that decisions on recording, generation of transcripts, storage, retention, live-streaming and related technical and manpower requirements would impact multiple NCLT benches and the NCLAT and therefore require inputs from Presidents of various NCLT benches and administrative decision-making by the competent authority. The Court noted practical considerations such as deployment of trained manpower, technical equipment, server location and storage facilities, and that specific case-directed directions may be issued by the concerned NCLT bench where necessary. The petitioner was granted liberty to place the petition before the Chairperson, and the Chairperson was requested to examine the viability of the reliefs sought concerning recordal of proceedings. [Paras 5, 6, 11, 12]Petition treated as a representation to the Hon'ble Chairperson, NCLAT, who is requested to examine the viability of the directions sought regarding recording, preservation and dissemination of NCLT/NCLAT proceedings; liberty granted to petitioner to place the petition before the Chairperson.Rejection of overbroad writ prayers - judicial restraint in issuing systemic directions against tribunals - Prayers seeking directions on manner of reserving, dictating and authoring judgments (clauses vii to xiii) are not sustainable and are rejected. - HELD THAT: - The Court held that the reliefs in prayer clauses (vii) to (xiii), which concern the manner in which judgments should be reserved, authored and dictated, go beyond the core issue raised concerning recordal of proceedings and therefore do not merit consideration. On that basis the Court rejected those specific prayers as overbroad and outside the scope of the petition's main thrust. [Paras 8]Prayers in clauses (vii) to (xiii) are rejected as going beyond the core issue and not warranting consideration.Final Conclusion: The writ petition is disposed of by treating it as a representation to the Hon'ble Chairperson, NCLAT, for examination of the viability of directions relating to recording, live-streaming, storage, retention and provision of transcripts/recordings of NCLT/NCLAT proceedings; the petitioner has liberty to place the petition before the Chairperson. Prayer clauses (vii) to (xiii) are rejected. The petition is disposed of and the pending application stands closed. Issues:Seeking directions for proceedings before NCLT and NCLAT to be recorded and transparent.Analysis:The writ petition primarily sought directions for proceedings before the National Company Law Tribunals (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to be recorded to enhance transparency and decision-making robustness. The petitioner's counsel argued that this measure would ensure transparency in the decision-making process. The prayers in the writ petition included challenging the validity of Rule 45(6) of the NCLT Rules, seeking live-streaming of proceedings, activation of recording features, provision of recordings and transcripts to interested parties, and adherence to procedural requirements for judgments. The representation made to the President of NCLT was pending consideration, indicating ongoing efforts to address the issues raised.The High Court acknowledged the potential impact of any decision on all NCLT benches and the NCLAT, suggesting that the writ petition should be treated as a representation to be handled by the Chairperson of NCLAT. This approach was deemed necessary to gather input from various NCLT bench Presidents on the feasibility of generating transcripts and establishing storage facilities. Considerations included manpower deployment, technical equipment, and server locations, with specific directions potentially issued by individual NCLT benches as needed. The Court noted that rules for Video Conferencing (VC) proceedings were already in place, aligning with broader efforts to streamline procedural aspects.While the Court recognized the importance of recording proceedings, it found the additional prayer clauses (vii) to (xiii) regarding judgment reservation and authorship to be beyond the core issue of recording transparency. Consequently, these prayers were rejected. Respondents raised objections regarding the maintainability of the writ petition based on territorial jurisdiction and authority to file the action, but the Court deferred this aspect due to the representation approach. The petitioner was granted liberty to present the matter to the NCLAT Chairperson for further examination of the directions sought. Ultimately, the writ petition was disposed of under these terms, with the pending application closed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found