Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a manual refund application could be processed notwithstanding the electronic filing requirement, and whether the appellate order rejecting such refund claim deserved to be quashed.
Analysis: Rule 97A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 contains a non-obstante clause and expressly provides that any reference to electronic filing on the common portal shall include manual filing of the relevant application or procedure. This statutory rule operates within Chapter X governing refunds and cannot be overridden or diluted by administrative instructions or circulars issued under the Act. Rule 89 prescribes the refund mechanism, but it must be read consistently with Rule 97A, which preserves manual filing where the process so requires. The Court also emphasised that technical difficulties should not defeat legitimate refund claims and that the system ought to be administered in a more assessee-friendly manner.
Conclusion: The manual refund application was required to be processed, and the impugned appellate order was liable to be set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory rule expressly permits manual filing notwithstanding electronic filing requirements, administrative circulars cannot override or control that rule.