Concealment penalty fails where seized material does not clearly establish the relevant year of alleged cash payment.

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held unsustainable where the seized material and accompanying statement did not clearly establish the financial year or assessment year in which the alleged cash payment was made. Although the quantum addition had been sustained and the papers could still support an addition under section 69B, the ambiguity on year-wise attribution prevented penal liability from being fastened. The decision treats penalty proceedings as independent from assessment proceedings and requires clear evidence of concealment for the relevant year before concealment penalty can be imposed.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable where the seized material and statement evidence did not clearly establish the assessment year in which the alleged cash payment was made.

Analysis: The addition in quantum had already been sustained, but penalty proceedings were treated as independent and distinct from assessment proceedings. The seized paper was dated 07.10.2006 and the accompanying statement did not clearly identify the financial year or assessment year in which the cash component was paid. The material, therefore, created an ambiguity on the year-wise attribution of the alleged unaccounted payment. In penalty proceedings, such uncertainty was sufficient to prevent fastening penal liability, even though the same facts could still justify an addition under section 69B.

Conclusion: Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable and was deleted in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the year of the alleged undisclosed cash payment is not clearly established from the seized material and surrounding evidence, penalty for concealment cannot be sustained merely on the basis of the quantum addition.

---