1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal Rules: Mixing MS & HSD Not Manufacturing, Revenue's Appeal Dismissed.</h1> The Revenue's appeal concerning the respondent's mixing of MS and HSD to create new products was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the ... Process amounting to manufacture - process of mixing and blending makes a new product which is marketable in commercial parlance and it is a different product from MS and HSD - CBEC Circular No.139/08/2000-CX-4 dated 03.01.2001 - HELD THAT:- In respondentβs own case this Tribunal entertained the issue M/S. I.O.C. LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PATNA [2019 (4) TMI 1072 - CESTAT KOLKATA] and held that the process or treatment to enhance the marketability of a product or to improve the value addition does not amount to manufacture relying on the Tribunalβs decision in HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPN. LTD. VERSUS COMMR. OF C. EX, DELHI & ROHTAK [2008 (9) TMI 154 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI]. As the issue has already been decided in favour of the respondent in respondentβs own case for the earlier period, therefore, following the precedent decision in respondentβs own case, there are no merit in the appeal filed by the Revenue - appeal dismissed. The Revenue appealed against the respondent mixing MS and HSD to create new products. Tribunal ruled in favor of respondent, citing precedent that such process does not amount to manufacture. Appeal dismissed, impugned order upheld.