TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether gold bars sold by the appellant fell within the exemption entry for articles of gold under Sl. No. 89 of Notification No. 01/2011-C.E. dated 01.03.2011, or were excluded as primary gold; (ii) whether gold coins and silver coins were manufactured or sold under a brand name so as to attract duty under the said notification.
Issue (i): whether gold bars sold by the appellant fell within the exemption entry for articles of gold under Sl. No. 89 of Notification No. 01/2011-C.E. dated 01.03.2011, or were excluded as primary gold.
Analysis: The relevant entry covered articles of gold manufactured or sold under a brand name, but the explanation expressly excluded primary gold, including bars, blocks, slabs, billets, shots, pellets, rods, sheets, foils and wires. The gold bars in question were found to be primary gold in unfinished or semi-finished form. Since the demand on this count related to gold bars specifically excluded by the notification, they could not be treated as excisable goods under the entry.
Conclusion: The demand of duty on gold bars was not sustainable and was answered in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): whether gold coins and silver coins were manufactured or sold under a brand name so as to attract duty under the said notification.
Analysis: The articles were examined and found not to bear any logo, trademark, brand name, or other mark or symbol indicating a branded product. The applicable departmental circular clarified that duty would attach only where the trade or brand name was indelibly marked or embossed on the article itself, and not merely on packaging or related documents. On that basis, the coins could not be treated as branded goods under the notification.
Conclusion: The demand of duty on gold coins and silver coins was not sustainable and was answered in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The duty demand and consequential penalties were set aside because the impugned goods were not liable to excise duty under the exemption entry relied upon by the department.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the exemption entry excludes primary gold and duty on articles of gold is attracted only when the article itself is sold under a brand name, goods lacking an indelibly marked brand name on the article and falling within the exclusion cannot be subjected to excise duty under that notification.
TaxTMI 
