Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders arising from mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A were liable to be interfered with for breach of natural justice and, if so, whether the matters should be remanded for fresh consideration with conditions.
Analysis: The liability arose from an alleged mismatch between the taxpayer's GSTR-3B returns and the auto-populated GSTR-2A data. The order notes the administrative difficulties in such mismatch cases and refers to Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST dated 27.12.2022, which was issued to guide the procedure in such matters. The record also contained a Chartered Accountant's certificate explaining the disparity. Although the taxpayer had not responded to the notices or participated in the original assessment proceedings, the surrounding circumstances were found sufficient to warrant interference, but only on terms requiring a partial deposit and permitting a reply to the show cause notice.
Conclusion: The assessment orders were quashed and the matters were remanded for reconsideration after the taxpayer remitted 10% of the disputed tax demand for each assessment period, filed a reply, and was afforded a reasonable opportunity including personal hearing.