Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned order confirming service tax demand was liable to be quashed and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication, subject to deposit of a part of the disputed tax.
Analysis: The dispute arose from a show cause notice invoking the extended period of limitation and culminating in confirmation of service tax and cess for the relevant period. Considering the submissions on merits and the request for conditional relief, the Court granted limited indulgence by requiring deposit of 25% of the disputed tax in cash within 30 days. On compliance, the impugned order was to stand quashed and the matter was to be reconsidered by the adjudicating authority after receipt of reply to the show cause notice, with cooperation from the petitioner.
Conclusion: The impugned order was quashed conditionally, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision on merits after compliance with the deposit condition.