Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (6) TMI 1136 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessee has right to select accounting method for revenue recognition if consistently followed per ICAI standards ITAT Delhi ruled on assessee's change from percentage of completion method (POCM) to project completion method (PCM) for revenue recognition. AO added ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Assessee has right to select accounting method for revenue recognition if consistently followed per ICAI standards

                            ITAT Delhi ruled on assessee's change from percentage of completion method (POCM) to project completion method (PCM) for revenue recognition. AO added financial impact of accounting method change as current year profit, resulting in abnormally high profit margins. ITAT held that selection of accounting method is assessee's right, provided it's consistently followed per ICAI/IAS standards. AO cannot restrict method selection or treat accounting impact as profit understatement. Matter remitted to AO for verification of proper implementation and consistency, with directions to provide adequate hearing opportunity.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Change in Accounting Policy
                            2. Addition of Rs. 9,47,14,870/- to Income
                            3. Validity of Assessment by NFAC
                            4. Levy of Interest under Section 234A and 234B

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Change in Accounting Policy:
                            The primary issue revolves around the change in the accounting policy by the assessee from the percentage of completion method (POCM) to the project completion method (PCM) for revenue recognition. The assessee argued that this change was in line with the Indian Accounting Standard (IND AS) 115, which was adopted following guidelines issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). The assessee contended that the change was bona fide and necessary to reflect the true financial position, as the previous method resulted in recognizing revenue prematurely.

                            The Assessing Officer (AO) and the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [Ld. CIT(A)] questioned the change, suspecting it was intended to understate profits. The AO noted that had the earlier method been followed, the profit would have increased by Rs. 9,47,14,870/-. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, citing a lack of cogent reasons for the change and the absence of a comprehensive impact analysis on previous years' financials.

                            2. Addition of Rs. 9,47,14,870/- to Income:
                            The AO added Rs. 9,47,14,870/- to the assessee's income, arguing that the change in the accounting method led to an understatement of profit. The assessee contended that no income had accrued as the project was incomplete, and the change in method was to correct an earlier incorrect practice. The Tribunal observed that the assessee had disclosed the change in accounting policy in the financial statements but had not adequately demonstrated the financial impact of this change. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify the financial impact of the change in accounting policy on both the current and previous years and to ensure that the correct profit is taxed.

                            3. Validity of Assessment by NFAC:
                            The assessee challenged the validity of the assessment conducted by the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC), arguing that it was not in accordance with the provisions of Section 144B of the Income Tax Act and that no meaningful opportunity of being heard was provided. However, these grounds were not pressed by the assessee during the hearing, and the Tribunal did not address them in detail.

                            4. Levy of Interest under Section 234A and 234B:
                            The assessee disputed the levy of interest under Section 234A, arguing that the return of income was filed on time. The Tribunal noted that the levy of interest is consequential and depends on the final determination of taxable income. Since the issue of income determination was remitted back to the AO, the Tribunal directed the AO to reassess the interest liability as per law based on the revised income.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal remitted the issue of the change in accounting policy and the resultant addition of Rs. 9,47,14,870/- back to the AO for a thorough verification of the financial impact on both the current and previous years. The AO was directed to provide the assessee with a proper opportunity to present its case. The issue of interest under Section 234A was also remitted back for reassessment based on the revised taxable income. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found