Trust donations for capital asset acquisition ruled as capital receipts, not taxable income under Section 56(1)

ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee trust regarding taxation of donations received for capital asset acquisition. The trust treated donations as corpus fund and capital receipts rather than income. The Department argued donations should be taxed as income under Section 56(1). ITAT held that donations shown as subsidies for capital assets constitute capital receipts, not income, and directed deletion of the addition. Section 56(1) was deemed inapplicable as donations qualified as capital receipts per legal precedents.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Levying tax on donations received for acquisition of capital assets.
2. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
3. Treatment of donations as capital receipts or income from other sources.

Summary:

Condonation of Delay:
The appellant's counsel highlighted an 11-day delay in filing the appeal, which was attributed to the delayed notice of the impugned order. The Tribunal condoned the delay, noting it was not extraordinary and admitted the appeal for hearing on merit.

Levying Tax on Donations:
The primary issue was whether the donations of Rs. 1,15,00,000/- received by the appellant for acquiring capital assets should be taxed as income or treated as capital receipts. The appellant argued that these donations were capital receipts, not liable to tax, as they were received with specific directions for acquiring assets.

Arguments by the Appellant:
1. The donations were received for specific purposes, such as purchasing equipment and setting up facilities, thus qualifying as capital receipts.
2. The appellant treated the donations as subsidies in their books, reducing the cost of assets for depreciation purposes.
3. The appellant cited various judicial pronouncements supporting the view that such donations are capital receipts and not taxable.

Arguments by the Department (Revenue):
1. The Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) treated the donations as income from other sources, not capital receipts.
2. The AO argued that the appellant, being a business entity, cannot claim these donations as capital receipts.
3. The Department cited Section 2(24)(iia) and Section 56(1) of the Income Tax Act, asserting that voluntary contributions received by a trust should be considered income.

Tribunal's Findings:
1. The Tribunal referenced a similar case adjudicated by the Coordinate Bench, which treated such donations as capital receipts.
2. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant's argument that donations received with specific directions for capital expenditure should be treated as capital receipts.
3. The Tribunal held that the provisions of Section 56(2)(x) apply to gifts received after 1.4.2017 and do not affect the years under consideration.
4. The Tribunal rejected the Department's argument under Section 56(1), stating that for invoking Section 56(1), the amount must qualify as income, whereas the donations in question were capital receipts.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and directed the AO to delete the addition made on account of donations, concluding that the donations received by the appellant were capital receipts and not taxable. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.

---