Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was bound to give effect to the final appellate order and consider the petitioner's request for rectification and refund of the excess amount.
Analysis: The appellate order in favour of the petitioner had attained finality and could not be disregarded unless set aside in the manner known to law. A pending or proposed challenge did not justify non-compliance, and the respondent was required to act on the petitioner's representation seeking correction of the subsequent order and refund of the amount, if available, in accordance with the statutory refund and interest provisions.
Conclusion: The respondent was directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation within the stipulated time and to refund the amount, if any available, to the petitioner.