TPO must re-examine domestic services additions in transfer pricing adjustments after MAP resolution

ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes regarding transfer pricing adjustments. The TPO had computed adjustments on aggregate cost base including domestic operations costs, while the assessee argued that US-related transaction adjustments were resolved under MAP and domestic transaction adjustments with Indian entities were unjustified under Indian TP provisions. The tribunal held that ALP determination applies only to international transactions under Chapter X of the Income Tax Act. The matter was remanded to TPO for fresh examination to determine whether domestic services additions were legally sustainable, directing verification of whether adjustments regarding the domestic entity were warranted under law.

---

---

Issues involved:
The appeal challenges the assessment order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under sections 143(3), 144C(13), and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2016-17. The issues revolve around transfer pricing adjustments, MAP resolution, and the treatment of domestic operations in the assessment.

Transfer Pricing Adjustment Issue:
The assessee, a consulting services company, contested the transfer pricing adjustment proposed by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for both US and non-US related transactions. The assessee emphasized that the adjustment for US-related transactions had been resolved under Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) with the US entity. The contention was that the adjustment made for domestic transactions, specifically with Indian entities, was not justified as they fall outside the purview of Indian Transfer Pricing provisions. The assessee argued that the costs related to domestic operations should not have been included in the transfer pricing adjustments.

MAP Resolution and Domestic Operations:
The assessee presented evidence of MAP resolution between India and the US entity, highlighting the exclusion of US-related adjustments. The assessee pointed out that the revenue from Indian company operations was distinct from international transactions, emphasizing that no transfer pricing adjustment should apply to the domestic revenue. The modified grounds of appeal focused on the incorrect computation of transfer pricing adjustments concerning domestic operations, asserting that such adjustments were not sustainable post-MAP resolution.

Remand for Verification:
After considering the arguments, the Tribunal found merit in the assessee's contentions regarding the treatment of domestic operations in transfer pricing adjustments. The Tribunal agreed with the Revenue's submission to remand the matter back to the TPO for a thorough examination to determine the legality of the adjustments related to domestic services. Consequently, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the TPO for a fresh examination of the facts to ascertain the validity of the adjustments concerning domestic operations.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the matter to the TPO for a reevaluation of the transfer pricing adjustments concerning domestic operations. The decision was based on the need for a detailed examination to ensure the adjustments align with the legal framework governing transfer pricing in domestic transactions. The order was pronounced in the Open Court on 27th March 2024.

---