Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>TCS liability shown in audit report cannot be added under section 43B as it's not an allowable expense or claimed deduction</h1> The ITAT Amritsar held that TCS (Tax Collected at Source) payable shown in audit report cannot be added under section 43B as it is neither an allowable ... Addition u/s 43B - TCS payable in the Audit report - Whether CIT (A) & and AO have erred in making addition u/s 43B of TCS payable which is neither an allowable expense nor has been claimed by the Appellant in his return? - This is a case of tax collected at source by the assessee from the buyer - assessee is engaged in the business of trading in Scrap and the provisions of section 206C(1) of the Act 61, is applicable on him for collection of provisions of section 206C(1) of the Act 61, is applicable on him for collection of tax at specified percentage of consideration of sales, as income tax. HELD THAT:- From the reading of various sub sections of sec 206C of the Act 61, it is clear that the tax collected by the assessee, under the provisions of this section, is the income tax portion of the buyer of the goods, which is collected by the assessee from the buyer, to be subsequently credited to the account of the Central Government within stipulated time frame provided by the statute. Sub section (6A) further provides that in case of failure of the assessee he shall be deemed to be an assessee in default in respect of the tax. The case of the assessee is covered by sub section (8), of the said section where the assessee has not paid the tax to the credit of the Central Government, after the collection, then the tax amount along with interest shall be a charge upon all assets of the person. TCS amount is β€œincome tax” of the buyer of goods collected by the assessee (seller) for subsequent payment of the amount so collected to the credit of the Central Government, and the assessee is simply holding the said amount as custodian of the Government, till the time of actual deposit. In the instant case, before us the assessee has declared sales in audited profit and loss account at Rs. 9.91 crores (which is excluding TCS) (as confirmed by the AR during hearing of the case) and since the TCS is not credited in the accounts, the question of debit of the said amount in profit and loss account, also does not arise. TCS amount is not a sum payable by the assessee, it is the income tax of the buyers, collected and retained, by the assessee as per provisions of section 206C of the Act 61, and recorded through journal entries, and held by the assessee as custodian of the Government, and the same is duly reflected as liability in the audited balance sheet as at 31/03/2022. Since, the said amount of β€œincome tax” of the buyers, cannot be debited in profit and loss account and claimed as a deduction, the assessee, it is not hit by the provisions of section 43B and the addition is liable to be deleted. Appeal of assessee allowed. Issues involved:The judgment involves the interpretation of provisions u/s 43B of the Income Tax Act 1961 regarding the disallowance of TCS payable amount in the audit report.Issue 1: Disallowance of TCS payable amountThe appeal was against the order of the JCIT(A) - 12, Mumbai, passed u/s 250 of the Act 61, dated 15/09/2023, arising from the order of the CPC Bangalore u/s 143(1) of the Act 61. The grounds of appeal by the assessee challenged the addition of Rs. 4,83,000/- in the returned income on account of TCS payable in the audit report. The dispute centered around the reporting of TCS payable amount in the tax audit report (TAR) by the auditor, leading to the disallowance u/s 43B of the Act 61.Issue 2: Correctness of TCS collection figureDuring the first appellate proceedings, the assessee contended that there was an error in reporting the TCS collection figure in the TAR, which should have been Rs. 4,10,834/- instead of Rs. 4,83,000/-. The assessee argued that since the amount was not claimed as a deduction in the profit and loss account, it should not be disallowed under section 43B of the Act 61. However, the first appellate authority upheld the addition, emphasizing that the assessee should have rectified the error in the audit report in a timely manner.Issue 3: Legal interpretation of TCS provisionsThe Tribunal analyzed the provisions of section 206C(1) of the Act 61, which require the seller to collect tax at source from the buyer. It was highlighted that the TCS amount collected by the assessee is essentially the income tax of the buyer, held by the assessee as a custodian for the government. The Tribunal clarified that since the TCS amount was not debited in the profit and loss account and was held as a liability in the balance sheet, it should not be disallowed under section 43B of the Act 61.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 4,10,834/-, as it was held that the TCS amount collected was not a sum payable by the assessee but the income tax of the buyers, held in trust for the government. The judgment emphasized the distinction between TCS amounts held as custodian and actual payable sums, leading to the deletion of the disallowance under section 43B of the Act 61.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found