Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, special surcharge under the Finance Act, 1957 was leviable on dividend income where clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 2 directed that income-tax on dividend income be calculated at the rates under the Finance Act, 1956.
Analysis: The relevant provisions of the Finance Act, 1957 show that income-tax on dividend income was to be computed under section 2(3)(a) by applying the rates under the Finance Act, 1956, but that computation yielded only the income-tax simpliciter. Under section 2(1)(a) of the Finance Act, 1957, the amount so computed was then liable to be increased by surcharge and special surcharge in the manner provided in the First Schedule. The expression "income-tax" in section 2(3)(a) was therefore construed in the same limited sense as in section 2(1), excluding surcharge and special surcharge. Dividend income being unearned income, the special surcharge was attracted notwithstanding the reference to the 1956 rates for computing income-tax.
Conclusion: The special surcharge was leviable on dividend income, and the reference was answered against the assessee and in favour of the revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a finance enactment first prescribes the rate for income-tax and separately directs that the tax so computed be increased by surcharge and special surcharge, the term "income-tax" used for rate computation excludes those surcharges unless the statute expressly provides otherwise.