1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court Grants Relief in GST Case, Orders Appeal Filing and Timely Disposition Under Rule 25 Proceedings</h1> The HC allowed writ petitions challenging GST proceedings, directing the petitioner to file an appeal by 07.06.2024. The court mandated respondents to ... Maintainability of petition - availability of alternative remedy - HELD THAT:- The Petitioner having not appeared before the original authority is permitted to produce all the documentary evidence available with him before the Appellate Authority and the same shall be considered objectively by the Appellate Authority and the rights of the Petitioner shall not be foreclosed merely because the proceedings is in the form of an Appeal. The petition is disposed off. Issues involved: Writ petitions filed to quash orders in GST proceedings, availability of alternative remedy, rights of petitioner in appeal process.Judgment Summary:Issue 1: Quashing of orders in GST proceedingsThe Writ Petitioner filed two petitions to quash orders in GST proceedings dated 07.03.2024 and 08.03.2024 respectively. The learned standing counsel pointed out that the impugned orders are appealable under the statute. The Court directed the Petitioner to file an Appeal by 07.06.2024, with a mandate for the Respondents to dispose of the Appeal within three months. The Petitioner, who did not appear before the original authority, was allowed to present all documentary evidence before the Appellate Authority. It was emphasized that the rights of the Petitioner should not be prejudiced due to the appeal process.Conclusion:The Court disposed of the Writ Petitions with the aforementioned directions, without imposing any costs. The connected Miscellaneous Petitions were also closed as a result of this judgment.