Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (6) TMI 499 - AT - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        CESTAT rules show cause notices invalid after voluntary service tax payment, rejects reverse charge liability for loan facilitation services CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeal, holding that show cause notices issued after appellant's voluntary payment of service tax dues were invalid. The ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            CESTAT rules show cause notices invalid after voluntary service tax payment, rejects reverse charge liability for loan facilitation services

                            CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeal, holding that show cause notices issued after appellant's voluntary payment of service tax dues were invalid. The tribunal found no liability for service tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism for business auxiliary services as appellants merely facilitated customer loans without rendering services to financial institutions. Demand for service tax on unclaimed creditors written off was rejected as amounts from accessory sales cannot constitute service provision. Extended limitation period was improperly invoked absent evidence of willful suppression or mala fide intent. The show cause notice was deemed void ab initio and time-barred, with no penalties imposable.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Short payment/non-payment of service tax.
                            2. Liability to pay service tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism.
                            3. Alleged rendering of Business Auxiliary Services.
                            4. Wrongful availing of Cenvat credit.
                            5. Invocation of extended period for demand.
                            6. Imposition of penalties.

                            Summary:

                            Issue 1: Short payment/non-payment of service tax
                            The appellant, M/s. Tanushka Automobiles Pvt. Ltd., was observed to have short paid service tax for various periods between 2010-11 and 2014-15. The amounts were identified through six Spot Memos. The appellant paid the amounts along with interest for five of the Spot Memos before the issuance of the Show Cause Notice (SCN). The Tribunal held that as per Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, the SCN should not have been issued for these five Spot Memos since the payments were made prior to the SCN. Consequently, the SCN was deemed void ab initio for these five Spot Memos, and no penalties were warranted.

                            Issue 2: Liability to pay service tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism
                            The appellant was found liable to pay service tax under the Reverse Charge Mechanism w.e.f. 01.07.2012, but the amount was unpaid. This was included in the SCN, but since the appellant paid the amount along with interest before the SCN, the Tribunal held that the SCN should not have been issued for this liability as well.

                            Issue 3: Alleged rendering of Business Auxiliary Services
                            The appellant contested the demand under Spot Memo No. 4, which alleged that amounts received as incentives, extension warranty commission, and unclaimed creditors written off were for rendering Business Auxiliary Services. The Tribunal found no evidence of an agreement or arrangement between the appellant and financial institutions to promote their business. It was held that the appellant was promoting its own business by facilitating loans for its customers, not rendering Business Auxiliary Services. Thus, the demand under Spot Memo No. 4 was set aside.

                            Issue 4: Wrongful availing of Cenvat credit
                            The appellant was alleged to have wrongly availed Cenvat credit of input service amounting to Rs.1,24,589/-. This was included in the SCN, but since the appellant paid the amount along with interest before the SCN, the Tribunal held that the SCN should not have been issued for this liability as well.

                            Issue 5: Invocation of extended period for demand
                            The department invoked the extended period alleging suppression of facts. The Tribunal held that mere non-declaration in ST-3 returns does not amount to willful suppression or misrepresentation. There was no evidence of mala fide intent by the appellant. Therefore, the extended period should not have been invoked, rendering the SCN barred by limitation.

                            Issue 6: Imposition of penalties
                            Given that the payments were made before the issuance of the SCN and there was no willful suppression, the Tribunal held that no penalties should be imposed. The SCN was void ab initio for five Spot Memos, and the demand under Spot Memo No. 4 was also set aside.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal set aside the order under challenge, holding the SCN void ab initio for five Spot Memos and barred by limitation. The demand under Spot Memo No. 4 was also set aside. The appeal was allowed.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found