Section 148 reassessment notice quashed for lack of credible information and mechanical acceptance without proper examination

The ITAT Kolkata quashed a notice issued u/s 148 for reassessment proceedings. The AO initiated reopening based on alleged credible information that the assessee received Rs. 35 lakh from a party, but failed to substantiate this claim. The assessee's statement showed only Rs. 20 lakh was received. The AO mechanically accepted information without applying his mind or examining its basis. Additionally, the same transaction with the same entity was scrutinized in the preceding assessment year without any addition. The tribunal held the information was not credible and the AO's non-application of mind rendered the notice unsustainable in law.

---

---

Issues Involved:
The judgment involves the legality of the notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the subsequent proceedings based on the alleged escapement of income amounting to Rs. 35,00,000.

Details of the Judgment:

Issue 1: Legality of Notice u/s 148 of the Act
The appeal challenged the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) u/s 250 of the Act, arising from an assessment order framed u/s 147 read with Section 144B. The assessee, a non-banking financial company, received a notice u/s 148 based on information regarding fund layering through bank accounts. The AO enhanced the total income by Rs. 35 Lakh, which was upheld by the CIT(A).

Issue 2: Challenge to the Addition of Rs. 35,00,000
The assessee contested the addition of Rs. 35 Lakh, arguing that the proceedings were without jurisdiction and bad in law. The counsel highlighted discrepancies in the alleged amount received from a specific company, emphasizing that only Rs. 20 Lakh was actually received. The counsel cited relevant case laws to support the argument that the AO failed to verify the genuineness of the information, rendering the notice illegal.

Judgment Summary:
The Tribunal examined the legality of the notice u/s 148 and subsequent proceedings. The AO's failure to substantiate the alleged receipt of Rs. 35 Lakh, coupled with the lack of verification of information, led to the quashing of the notice. Citing precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of a valid notice and the necessity for a rational connection between the information and the belief of income escapement. The Tribunal held that the AO did not apply his mind to the information, leading to the illegal issuance of notices u/s 148, which were subsequently quashed. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the entire proceedings were annulled.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal's decision focused on the procedural irregularities in issuing the notice u/s 148 and emphasized the AO's obligation to verify information before taking action. The judgment underscored the significance of a valid notice and the need for a rational basis for believing in income escapement, ultimately leading to the quashing of the proceedings in favor of the assessee.

---