Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount received under the hail-damage insurance clause for damage to green leaf in a tea estate constituted agricultural income exempt under section 4(3)(viii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The receipt arose under a special insurance clause covering damage by hail to the growing crop. Rule 24 of the Income-tax Rules, 1922, applies only to income derived from the sale of tea grown and manufactured by the seller and to the apportionment between agricultural and manufacturing operations; it does not govern a receipt of this nature. The payment was found to relate directly to damage to the growing crop, which formed part of the assessee's agricultural operations. A sum received in substitution of the loss of agricultural produce retains the character of the source from which it arises when it represents the profit of agricultural operations.
Conclusion: The receipt was agricultural income and was exempt under section 4(3)(viii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922; the question was answered in the affirmative and against the revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment received under an insurance clause compensating for damage to growing agricultural crop is agricultural income when it represents the profit of agricultural operations, and is exempt accordingly.