Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue appeals were maintainable in view of the monetary limit prescribed in the CBIC instructions issued under Section 131BA of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The appeals were each below the revised monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs prescribed for filing appeals before the Tribunal. The instructions of 02.11.2023, issued in exercise of the Board's statutory power, require that appeals below the prescribed limit should not be filed and pending matters within the limit should be withdrawn. The Tribunal also noted the consistent view that such circulars and instructions are binding on the department and are meant to reduce avoidable litigation.
Conclusion: The appeals were not maintainable because they fell below the prescribed monetary threshold, and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: A departmental appeal below the monetary limit fixed by binding instructions issued under Section 131BA of the Customs Act, 1962 is not maintainable and must be dismissed to give effect to the statutory litigation policy.