Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the labour charges received for cutting, shearing, bending, punching, welding and allied operations on boiler parts were liable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Services, or whether the activity amounted to manufacture and was excluded from the levy.
Analysis: The activity undertaken resulted in conversion of steel plates and sheets into boiler components intended for further assembly, and therefore changed the identity of the goods. The definition of Business Auxiliary Services under Section 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994 excludes activities amounting to manufacture of excisable goods. The job-work arrangement was also treated as covered by Notification No. 214/86-CE, under which the principal manufacturer bears the excise obligation. Following the earlier decision on similar work and the view taken for the subsequent period, the activity was held to be manufacture and not a taxable service.
Conclusion: The demand of service tax was not sustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.