Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition should be disposed of with protective directions where the appellate Tribunal has not yet been constituted, and whether the petitioner should be given liberty to avail the statutory appeal remedy on constitution of the Tribunal.
Analysis: The Tribunal was not constituted at the time of hearing, and the parties agreed that the petition need not remain pending. The Court accepted the request for disposal with protection under Section 112(8) of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It directed that if the petitioner makes payment as contemplated by that provision and avails the statutory appeal remedy within three months from the date of constitution of the Tribunal, further recovery proceedings for the balance amount shall not be drawn.
Conclusion: The petition was disposed of with protective directions in favour of the petitioner, preserving the right to appeal once the Tribunal is constituted.
Final Conclusion: The order grants interim procedural protection against recovery while keeping the statutory appellate remedy available to the petitioner upon constitution of the Tribunal.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the appellate Tribunal under the GST regime has not yet been constituted, the High Court may dispose of the writ petition with protective directions safeguarding the assessee's appellate remedy and restricting recovery, subject to compliance with Section 112(8).