Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment initiated beyond four years from the end of the assessment year was valid in the absence of any finding that the assessee had failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment.
Analysis: The reopening was based on the Revenue's view that deduction under section 43B had been wrongly claimed in respect of excise duty on stock in bonded warehouse. The material fact relating to the claim had, however, been fully disclosed in the original assessment completed under section 143(3). In the absence of any recorded failure to disclose material facts, the proviso to section 147 barred reassessment after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year.
Conclusion: The reassessment was invalid and barred by limitation; the issue is decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Reassessment under the proviso to section 147 cannot be initiated after four years from the end of the relevant assessment year unless income has escaped assessment by reason of the assessee's failure to make a return or to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment.