Appellant not liable for service tax under GTA provisions despite hiring vehicles for PSC pole transportation

CESTAT Bangalore held that appellant was not liable for service tax under GTA service provisions despite hiring vehicles through contracts for transporting PSC poles. The tribunal found that merely hiring vehicles for goods transportation does not constitute a Goods Transport Agency. Key factors included absence of consignment notes and submission of fortnightly waybills to consignees for transport charge collection. The tribunal concluded appellant could not be considered a GTA and therefore was not liable for service tax, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.

---

---

Issues Involved: Determination of liability to pay Service Tax u/s 65(50b) for transportation services provided by the appellant.

Summary:
The appellant, a manufacturer and supplier of Pre-Stressed Concrete Poles (PSC Poles) for the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB), appealed against the Order-in-Appeal holding them liable to pay Service Tax for transportation services provided. The dispute revolved around the interpretation of the definition of 'Goods Transport Agency' u/s 65(50b) and the requirement of issuing consignment notes.

The appellant's counsel argued that post 01.05.2006, services provided by any person were taxable under Section 65(50b), emphasizing the necessity of satisfying both the conditions of transport of goods and issuing consignment notes as per Rule 4B of Service Tax Rules, 1994. Citing various precedents, the counsel contended that mere transportation of goods does not automatically attract Service Tax as a Goods Transport Agency (GTA).

The Authorized Representative (AR) relied on the amended definition of 'Goods Transport Agency' to assert the appellant's liability for Service Tax due to arranging transportation and collecting freight charges. Referring to relevant case laws, the AR supported the position that the appellant fell under the purview of a GTA.

After hearing both sides, the Tribunal considered the period of dispute from 01.01.2005 to 30.06.2007 and examined the appellant's practice of hiring vehicles for transporting PSC Poles without issuing consignment notes. Citing precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant's activities did not qualify them as a GTA, thereby absolving them of Service Tax liability.

In light of the discussions and legal interpretations presented, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant.

(Order pronounced in Open Court on 20.05.2024.)

---