TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Confirms Right to CENVAT Credit on Inputs, Prioritizing Duty Payment Over Manufacturing Process Criteria.</h1> <h3>M/s Hind Udyog Versus The Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-IV</h3> M/s Hind Udyog Versus The Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-IV - TMI Issues involved: Whether the process of drawing from bars and rods amounts to manufacture for availing CENVAT credit.Summary:The appellants, engaged in manufacturing steel cubes, procured bright steel bars as inputs and availed CENVAT credit. The Department contended that the process of drawing from bars and rods does not constitute manufacture, leading to denial of CENVAT credit. Multiple show cause notices were issued, culminating in confirmation of the denial by the original authority and Commissioner (Appeals).Appellant's Argument:The appellant's counsel argued that denial of CENVAT credit solely based on the supplier's process not amounting to manufacture is unjust. Referring to a CBEC Circular and legal precedents, it was emphasized that duty payment on inputs should entitle them to avail CENVAT credit. Additionally, a decision by the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of similar manufacturers was cited as establishing the issue's finality in the appellant's favor.Department's Response:The Authorized Representative for the Department reiterated the findings of the impugned order, supporting the denial of CENVAT credit.Tribunal's Decision:After considering both sides and reviewing the case records, the Tribunal found no provision in the CENVAT Credit Rules to deny credit to manufacturers who have paid duty on inputs, even if under a mistaken legal notion. Citing precedents, including the case of Bhambra Fabricators, the Tribunal held that duty payment on inputs entitles manufacturers to avail CENVAT credit, irrespective of the final product's excisability. The Tribunal emphasized that if duty has been paid on inputs, credit cannot be denied, regardless of whether the input resulted from a manufacturing process. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, affirming the appellants' right to avail CENVAT credit on the inputs procured.Operative part of the order: The appeal was allowed, as pronounced in the open court.
TaxTMI 