Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit could be denied to a manufacturer who received inputs on payment of duty merely because the supplier's process did not amount to manufacture.
Analysis: The entitlement to credit depends on receipt of inputs on payment of duty and their use in the manufacturing chain. Where duty has been paid on the inputs and the invoices evidence such payment, the absence of manufacture at the supplier's end does not, by itself, justify denial of credit. The matter was treated as no longer res integra in view of prior Tribunal decisions applying the same principle.
Conclusion: CENVAT credit could not be denied, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit on duty-paid inputs cannot be refused merely because the supplier's process is later held not to amount to manufacture.