Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency services was sustainable when the transporters furnished certificates stating that tax had already been discharged and no Cenvat credit had been availed, and whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 32/2004-ST dated 03.12.2004.
Analysis: The transporters' certificates showed that they had not availed Cenvat credit and had not claimed deduction for the cost of goods used in providing the transport service. The Tribunal also noted that, on similar facts, it had consistently held that once tax has already been paid on the service, the department cannot demand the same tax again from another person, as that would amount to double taxation. The documentary evidence produced by the appellant was therefore sufficient to negate the demand raised against it.
Conclusion: The demand was unsustainable and the appellant was entitled to relief.