ITAT rules stock differences from survey must be taxed as business income not unexplained investment under Section 69B

The ITAT Chennai held that stock differences identified during a survey u/s 133A should be assessed as business income rather than unexplained investment u/s 69B. The AO had computed differential stock using a mathematical formula based on 7% GP rate without noting physical stock discrepancies. Since the assessee's sole income source was business, operated through bank transfers, and no physical quantity discrepancies were found, the excess stock arose from normal business operations. The tribunal ruled that undisclosed business income was ploughed back into stock acquisition, making it assessable as business income only, not subject to higher tax rates u/s 115BBE.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Determination of the head of income under which the impugned additions would be assessable.
2. Application of Section 69B and Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act.

Summary:

Issue 1: Determination of the Head of Income

The assessee, a rice mill, was subjected to a survey u/s 133A on 27-02-2018, revealing a discrepancy between the physical stock valued at Rs. 607.86 Lacs and the book stock valued at Rs. 321.55 Lacs. The difference of Rs. 286.31 Lacs was offered to tax by the assessee as 'Business Income'. The assessee argued that the excess stock was part of the regular business operations and should be assessed under 'Business Income'. The Tribunal noted that the entire stock was accumulated from the business income and any discrepancies should be considered part of the business operations. It was held that the impugned additions should be assessed as 'Business Income' and not under any other head.

Issue 2: Application of Section 69B and Section 115BBE

The Ld. AO treated the excess stock as unexplained investment u/s 69B, subjecting it to a higher tax rate u/s 115BBE. The assessee contended that the stock was a current asset and not an investment, and thus, Section 69B was not applicable. The Tribunal observed that the stock was part of the business operations and not an unexplained investment. It was held that the provisions of Section 69B and Section 115BBE were not applicable in this case. The Tribunal directed the Ld. AO to recompute the tax payable by the assessee under the head 'Business Income'.

Conclusion:

The appeal was allowed, and the additions were directed to be assessed as 'Business Income' only, with no application of Section 69B r.w.s. 115BBE. The Ld. AO was instructed to recompute the tax payable accordingly.

---