Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Customs Department was liable to bear the demurrage charges for the period during which the goods remained detained, and whether the importer remained liable for demurrage after the detention period expired.
Analysis: The detention certificate issued by the Customs authorities recorded that the detention was not due to any fault or negligence of the importer and that the delay arose from the departmental process. That admission was treated as a crucial factor supporting an equitable direction that the Department should bear the demurrage for the period of wrongful detention. At the same time, the petitioner had not challenged the Port Trust's demand and the port remission regime was confined to the period covered by the detention certificate. The Court therefore limited the Department's liability to the certified detention period and held that demurrage after expiry of that period could not be shifted to the Department.
Conclusion: The Customs Department was directed to pay the demurrage charges for the detention period from 30-6-1997 to 4-8-2004, and the petitioner was held liable for demurrage thereafter until clearance of the goods.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded only to the extent of shifting the demurrage burden for the certified period of detention to the Customs Department, while the importer remained liable for the balance period before release of the cargo.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the customs detention of imported goods is expressly certified to be without fault of the importer, the Customs Department may be directed in equity to bear the demurrage for the detention period, while liability for the post-detention period remains with the importer unless separately relieved under the applicable port law.