TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tax Authorities Must Reconsider Invoice Duplication Case After Proving No Revenue Loss or Intentional Fraud Under GST Rules</h1> <h3>M/s. A. Ansari Abu Agencies Represented by its Proprietor Mr. Abdul Jabbar Ansari Versus The Superintendent of GST and Central Excise</h3> M/s. A. Ansari Abu Agencies Represented by its Proprietor Mr. Abdul Jabbar Ansari Versus The Superintendent of GST and Central Excise - 2024 (86) G.S.T.L. ... Issues involved: Challenge to an order regarding mismatch between GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns.Summary:The petitioner, a registered person under GST enactments, filed GSTR 1 with an error of providing details for the same invoice multiple times. Upon intimation of discrepancies, petitioner clarified the error was inadvertent and correct details were in GSTR 3B. Certificates from purchasers confirmed they excluded duplicate invoices for availing input tax credit (ITC). The impugned order imposed tax liability despite no revenue loss.The respondent argued that petitioner failed to rectify GSTR 1 within the prescribed time limit, hence the order was valid. However, petitioner's submissions and purchaser certificates indicated no excess ITC was claimed based on duplicate invoices.The impugned order was set aside, remanding the matter for reconsideration. The court directed the respondent to provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, including a personal hearing, and issue a fresh order within two months.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
