Service tax demand under Construction of Residential Complex Services cannot be sustained for composite contracts involving both services and goods

CESTAT Chennai held that service tax demand under Construction of Residential Complex Services cannot be sustained for composite contracts involving both services and goods/materials. Such composite construction activities fall under Works Contract Services definition effective from 01.06.2007, not Construction of Residential Complex which applies only to service simplicitor. Following precedents in Real Value Promoters and Srinivasa Shipping cases, the Tribunal ruled that demands under Residential Complex Services/CICS/CCS cannot be sustained prior to 01.07.2012 for composite construction services. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed.

---

---

Issues involved:
The issues involved in this judgment are related to the demand of service tax under Construction of Residential Complex services, specifically focusing on the applicability of the definition of "Residential Complex" and Works Contract Services u/s 65(105)(zzzza).

Details of the judgment:

Issue 1: Demand of Service Tax under Construction of Residential Complex Services
The appellant, engaged in providing construction of residential complex services, was found to have not paid service tax on certain projects. The Department issued a Show Cause Notice demanding service tax on land owner shares. The appellant argued that the demand cannot be sustained under Construction of Residential Complex Services due to the nature of composite contracts involving both services and materials. The Tribunal referred to previous decisions and held that the demand under Construction of Residential Complex Services cannot be sustained for composite contracts prior to 01.06.2007. The Tribunal's decision was supported by the Hon'ble Apex Court in a related case. Therefore, the demand under Construction of Residential Complex Services was deemed unsustainable.

Issue 2: Applicability of Works Contract Services
The Tribunal clarified that the definition of Construction of Residential Complex does not apply to composite contracts involving both services and materials. Such contracts fall under Works Contract Services, effective from 01.06.2007. The Tribunal relied on previous cases to support the view that demands for composite construction services cannot be raised under Construction of Residential Complex Services. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential reliefs, if any, as per law.

This judgment provides clarity on the distinction between Construction of Residential Complex Services and Works Contract Services, emphasizing the importance of understanding the nature of contracts in determining the applicability of service tax.

---