Tribunal Directs AO to Reassess TDS Credit Denial Due to Deductor's Error, Citing Appellant's Genuine Hardship.

The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's genuine hardship due to non-reflection of TDS credit in Form 26AS, which was caused by the deductor's error. Although the AO's decision to deny credit was technically correct, the Tribunal directed the AO to verify the facts and consider using Section 119 of the Income Tax Act to resolve the issue. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, enabling the appellant to potentially receive the TDS credit for the relevant assessment year.

---

---

Issues involved: Non-allowance of credit of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the relevant assessment year.

Summary:

Issue 1: Non-allowance of TDS credit
The appeal was against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the non-allowance of TDS credit of Rs. 9,54,132/- in the relevant assessment year, despite the corresponding income being assessed. The Assessing Officer (AO) did not allow the TDS credit as it was not reflected in the assessee's 26AS statement. The appellant filed a rectification application which was rejected by the AO. The appellant argued that the deductor had wrongly shown the TDS amount in a different assessment year, leading to non-reflection in 26AS. The appellant requested the deductor to revise the TDS statement, but no action was taken.

Issue 2: Arguments
The appellant's representative argued that the TDS amount was not reflected in 26AS due to the deductor's error in submission. Supporting documents were provided to show the credit/reflection of the TDS amount in the bank account ledger. The appellant faced genuine hardship in not receiving the TDS credit, as it could not file a return for the year when the TDS was deducted since the business was not operational then.

Issue 3: Decision
After hearing both parties, the Tribunal acknowledged the genuine hardship faced by the appellant in not receiving the TDS credit. While technically the AO was justified in not allowing the credit due to non-reflection in 26AS, a solution had to be found. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify the facts and, if necessary, use Section 119 of the Act to address the appellant's grievance and allow the TDS credit for the relevant assessment year. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

This summary provides a detailed overview of the issues involved in the legal judgment, the arguments presented by both parties, and the decision rendered by the Tribunal.

---