Legal Challenge Succeeds: Full Tax Payment Enables Penalty Appeal Despite Procedural Delays Under Statutory Provisions

HC allowed petitioner to file a statutory appeal challenging 100% penalty despite delay, after full discharge of tax and interest liability. The court directed appellate authority to accept appeal within two weeks without limitation bar, effectively providing relief from procedural constraints while maintaining tax compliance.

---

---

Issues involved: Challenge to imposition of 100% penalty, delay in filing statutory appeal, discharge of tax and interest liability.

Imposition of 100% Penalty:
The order dated 12.09.2023 was challenged primarily due to the imposition of 100% penalty in relation to alleged wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit. The petitioner sought to contest the penalty liability through a statutory appeal after discharging the tax and interest liability as per receipts issued for payments made.

Delay in Filing Statutory Appeal:
The learned counsel for the petitioner explained that the statutory appeal was not filed earlier because the petitioner chose to discharge the tax and interest liability first. The writ petition was filed after the limitation period had expired, but it was noted that the entire tax and interest liability had been paid between 14.02.2024 and 18.03.2024.

Discharge of Tax and Interest Liability:
Considering that the petitioner had already discharged the entire tax and interest liability before filing the writ petition, the court deemed it appropriate to allow the petitioner to file a statutory appeal specifically addressing the penalty imposed under the impugned order dated 12.09.2023. The court directed the appellate authority to receive and decide on the appeal without considering the question of limitation, if filed within two weeks from the date of receipt of the court's order.

Conclusion:
The court disposed of the petition by permitting the petitioner to file a statutory appeal solely concerning the penalty within a specified timeframe, without costs. Additionally, the related motions were closed as a consequence of the judgment.

---