Small Form-factor Pluggable Optical Transceivers classified under CTI 8517 7090 eligible for duty concession under Notification 57/2017

CESTAT Mumbai ruled that Small Form-factor Pluggable Optical Transceivers are classifiable under CTI 8517 7090 as "other parts" rather than CTI 8517 6290 as claimed by Revenue. The tribunal found these goods eligible for duty concession under Serial No. 5(a) of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs, rejecting the Commissioner's finding that they constitute optical transport equipment ineligible for exemption. The appeal was allowed, overturning the denial of concessional Basic Customs Duty of 10% and confirming appellants' entitlement to notification benefits.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility of imported goods for exemption/duty concession under Notification No. 57/2017-Customs.
2. Classification of the imported goods under the appropriate Customs Tariff Item (CTI).
3. Confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties under relevant sections of the Customs Act, 1962.

Summary:

Issue 1: Eligibility for Exemption/Duty Concession
The appellants, M/s IBM India Limited, contested the denial of concessional duty under Notification No. 57/2017-Customs dated 30.06.2017 (Sl. No.20) for goods described as 'Small Form-factor Pluggable (SFP)-25G-SR Optical Transceiver, SFP-10G-SRL Optical Transceiver, QSFP-10G-UNIV Optical Transceiver, etc.'. The Department argued that these goods did not qualify for the exemption, leading to a demand of differential customs duty of Rs.36,16,445/- u/s 28(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, along with applicable interest, and proposed confiscation and penalties under Sections 111(m), 112(a), and 117.

Issue 2: Classification of Imported Goods
The appellants classified the goods under CTI 8517 6290, claiming duty concession. However, they later argued that these goods should be classified under CTI 8517 7090, as upheld by the Tribunal in the Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. case and confirmed by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal found that the goods were parts of Optical Transport Equipment and should be classified under CTI 8517 7090, making them eligible for exemption under Sl. No. 5(a) of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs.

Issue 3: Confiscation and Penalties
The appellants contended that there was no fraud or deliberate suppression, and the goods were properly declared, thus not warranting confiscation or penalties u/s 111. The Tribunal did not find sufficient grounds for confiscation and penalties, given the proper declaration of goods and lack of fraudulent intent.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the imported goods are classifiable under CTI 8517 7090 and eligible for exemption under Serial No. 5(a) of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs. The impugned order dated 27.01.2022 was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.

---