Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether late fee and interest were leviable under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 when the petitioner had initiated tax payment within time but credit to the tax pool was delayed due to the bank or GSTN process, and whether the amount debited under protest could be adjusted against future tax liability.
Analysis: The petitioner had initiated payment of the tax for April 2023 within the prescribed time and the amount stood debited from its account within time. On those facts, failure could not be attributed to the petitioner for purposes of levy of late fee and interest. The delay, if any, was attributable to the bank or GSTN after the petitioner had taken timely steps to pay the tax. In those circumstances, levy of penalty was unwarranted. The amount deposited under protest was also directed to be adjusted against future tax liability.
Conclusion: Late fee and interest were held to be not leviable on the petitioner for the delayed credit situation, and the amount deposited under protest was permitted to be adjusted against tax liability for subsequent months.