1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Cooperative Society Wins Appeal: ITAT Mumbai Grants Deduction Under Income Tax Section 80P(2)(d) for 2018-19.</h1> The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal by the assessee, a cooperative society, against the National Faceless Appeal Centre's order denying deduction u/s ... Deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) - interest received from the investments with the cooperative bank - HELD THAT:- As considered the order of the Ld. CIT(A) for the A.Y. 2017-18. We find that identical grievance was raised before the Ld. CIT(A) on identical set of facts and after considering the facts and the submissions and drawing support from various judicial decisions, the Ld. CIT(A) allowed the claim. It is true that revenue has not filed any appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) which means the issue has attained finality in the previous assessment year. On finding parity of facts, we do not find any reason why the similar claim of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act should not be allowed during the year also. Therefore, we direct the Assessing Officer to allow the impugned claim of deduction. Appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. Issues: Appeal against order denying deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2018-19.Summary:The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, denying the claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2018-19. The Assessing Officer had disallowed the claim stating that the interest received from investments with the cooperative bank was not eligible for deduction under the said section. The assessee's contention was that a similar claim was allowed in the previous assessment year 2017-18 by the Ld. CIT(A) and as the revenue did not appeal against that decision, the issue had attained finality. The ITAT Mumbai, after considering the orders of the authorities below and the previous year's decision, directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction under section 80P(2)(d) for the current assessment year as well. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.The ITAT Mumbai, comprising Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiya and Shri Sunil Kumar Singh, heard the appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, denying the claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2018-19. The assessee, a cooperative society, had declared total income and claimed the entire income as deduction under the said section. However, the Assessing Officer disallowed the claim, stating that the interest received from investments with the cooperative bank was not eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act.The assessee had previously carried the matter before the Ld. CIT(A) but without success. During the appeal before the ITAT, the counsel for the assessee highlighted that in the previous assessment year 2017-18, a similar claim was denied by the Assessing Officer but allowed by the Ld. CIT(A), and the revenue did not appeal against that decision, leading to the issue attaining finality. The ITAT, after careful consideration of the facts, previous year's decision, and various judicial decisions, found no reason to disallow the deduction for the current assessment year. Therefore, the ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to allow the claim of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act for the current assessment year, resulting in the appeal filed by the assessee being allowed.