Tribunal Ruling: Cylinder Skid Vehicle Charges Viewed as Transportation, Not Supply of Tangible Goods Service.

The CESTAT Ahmedabad set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals by remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh decision. The Tribunal determined that the provision of a cylinder skid vehicle on a per trip charge suggested a transportation activity rather than a 'supply of tangible goods for use' service. The Tribunal instructed reconsideration of the service under the Goods Transport Agency (GTA) category, leaving other issues open for further examination. The decision was pronounced on 15.04.2024.

---

---

Issues involved: Determination of liability to Service Tax for providing cylinder skid vehicle on a charge based on per trip under the category of 'supply of tangible goods for use' service.

Summary:
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad considered the issue of whether providing a cylinder skid vehicle on a charge based on per trip is subject to Service Tax under the category of 'supply of tangible goods for use' service. The appellant's counsel referenced a previous order where a similar issue was remanded to the adjudicating authority. The Revenue reiterated the findings of the impugned order. The Tribunal noted that in the appellant's case, a previous order remanded the matter for a fresh decision, and thus, the same approach should be followed in the present appeal.

In the appellant's case, it was argued that the transaction did not fall under the category of 'supply of tangible goods for use' service as effective control of the vehicle was transferred to the service recipient. The Tribunal observed that the charges were on a per trip basis, indicating a transportation activity rather than a rental service. The issue of whether the activity fell under Goods Transport Agency (GTA) service was not examined previously, and it was concluded that the matter needed to be reconsidered from the aspect of GTA, leaving all other issues open for further consideration.

Therefore, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed by way of remand to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh decision, taking into account the observations from the previous Tribunal's order. The Tribunal pronounced its decision on 15.04.2024.

---