Legal Challenge Succeeds: Tax Assessment Order Overturned Due to Insufficient Reasoning and Procedural Flaws

The HC allowed the writ petition challenging a tax assessment order due to procedural irregularities. The court found the respondents' order lacking proper reasoning and not adequately addressing the petitioner's reply. The HC set aside the order and directed respondents to pass a fresh order within six weeks, without imposing costs.

---

---

Issues involved:
The judgment involves challenging an impugned order related to tax assessment for the period between July 2017 to March 2018, focusing on the mismatch in Input Tax Credit availed in GSTR-3B returns compared to GSTR-2B/2A.

Details of the judgment:
The petitioner challenged the impugned order dated 30.12.2023 concerning the assessment year for the tax period between July 2017 to March 2018, the first year after the implementation of the demand. The petitioner contended that they had responded to the show cause notices but the respondents proceeded to pass the impugned order without proper consideration of the petitioner's reply. The impugned order highlighted a mismatch in Input Tax Credit availed in GSTR-3B returns compared to GSTR-2B/2A, indicating an excess claimed amount that reduced the output tax payment. The order initiated demand and recovery action u/s 73(1) of the TNGST Act / CGST Act 2017 due to the alleged discrepancies.

The respondents opposed the challenge, arguing that the petition was beyond the limitation period and referred to a Supreme Court decision. However, the Court noted that the impugned order lacked proper reasoning and did not consider the petitioner's reply filed on 01.11.2023. Consequently, the Court deemed the order as not sustainable and directed it to be set aside and remitted back to the respondents for a fresh order within six weeks. The Writ Petition was disposed of with this observation, and no costs were awarded.

---