Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a delayed GST appeal dismissed as time-barred could be restored and treated as maintainable under the special time-extension notification, subject to payment of the prescribed admitted tax and disputed tax percentage.
Analysis: Section 107 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 prescribes the normal period for filing an appeal and a further limited period for filing it with sufficient cause. The Court noted that the appeal had been filed beyond even that extended statutory period, but also that Notification No. 53 of 2023-Central Tax dated 02.11.2023 created a special procedure for appeals against specified orders under Sections 73 and 74 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, permitting filing up to 31.01.2024. The notification required payment of the admitted dues and a prescribed percentage of the disputed tax, along with the other conditions stated in the notification. Since the appeal had been dismissed by the first appellate authority, the Court found it appropriate to restore the appeal to the authority's file, subject to satisfaction of the notification conditions within the stipulated time.
Conclusion: The delayed appeal was directed to be restored and proceed on merits if the assessee complied with the notification conditions by the stipulated date; failing compliance, the impugned dismissal would stand restored.