Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on MS angles, channels, beams, joists, plates and similar steel items used in the fabrication of machinery, support structures and platforms inside the factory.
Analysis: The disputed items were used within the factory in fabrication of capital goods and supporting structures for plant and machinery. The governing approach, as applied in the cited precedents, is that steel items used in such fabrication are eligible either as inputs used in relation to manufacture or as components/accessories forming an integral part of the capital goods. The later judicial view displaced the earlier restrictive approach and accepted the user test and the integral-part test for Cenvat eligibility in respect of such items.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on the disputed MS structural items was admissible and the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The credit demand and penalties could not be sustained, and the appeals succeeded with relief to the appellants.
Ratio Decidendi: Steel items used in the fabrication of capital goods or their supporting structures within the factory qualify for Cenvat credit where they satisfy the user test or form an integral part of the capital goods.