TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Dismisses Petition, Upholds High Court Judgment, and Closes All Pending Applications.</h1> <h3>PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) 2 Versus DWARKA PRASAD AGGARWAL</h3> The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition, concluding that the HC's judgment did not require interference. All pending applications were also disposed ... Addition u/s 68 - unexplained credit brought to tax - Addition u/s 2(2)(e) - amounts secured as loan were treated as “deemed dividend” - HC [2018 (2) TMI 2113 - DELHI HIGH COURT] deleted both the additions as done by ITAT and decided the appeal in favour of assessee. HELD THAT:- As we are of the view that the judgment of the High Court does not warrant interference. Hence, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Title: Supreme Court dismisses Special Leave PetitionJudges: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind KumarRepresentation:- For Petitioner: Mr. Vikramjit Bannerjee, Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Mr. Siddharth Sinha, Mr. Prasanjeet Mahapatra, Mr. Dharmendra Singh, Ms. Sunita Singh- For Respondent: Mr. Y K Kapur, Mr. Bhushan Kapur, Mr. Amrendra Kumar MehtaDecision: The Court, after hearing the counsel, dismissed the Special Leave Petition as the judgment of the High Court did not warrant interference. Pending applications, if any, were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
