Binding departmental clarification on construction service tax led to remand for fresh adjudication on liability.

A later binding departmental circular clarified that developers, builders and promoters are not liable to service tax under Construction of Residential Complex Services. Because the original adjudicating authority did not consider that clarification, the controversy required fresh examination on de novo adjudication. The Tribunal therefore remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration in light of the clarified legal position, with the demand and pre-deposit challenge to be reassessed accordingly.

---

---

Issues: Whether the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication in view of the later Board circular clarifying that developers, builders and promoters are not liable to service tax under Construction of Residential Complex Services.

Analysis: The demand and pre-deposit were challenged on the ground that the taxable service invoked was Construction of Residential Complex Services. A Board circular issued after the adjudication order clarified the position that developers, builders and promoters are not liable under that category. As the adjudicating authority did not have the benefit of this clarification, the matter required reconsideration on a fresh examination of the controversy in light of the circular.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for de novo adjudication.

Final Conclusion: The dispute was sent back for fresh decision, and the appellant obtained the benefit of reconsideration on the clarified legal position.

Ratio Decidendi: A later binding departmental clarification relevant to the taxable category, if not considered by the original authority, can justify remand for de novo adjudication.

---