ITAT reduces section 69A addition for demonetization cash deposits, allows Rs. 2 lakh accumulated savings

ITAT Raipur partly allowed the assessee's appeal regarding addition under section 69A for cash deposits during demonetization. The AO had restricted available cash-in-hand to Rs. 1 lakh, but ITAT determined the assessee, who had been filing returns since AY 2002-03, could have accumulated Rs. 2 lakh from savings over preceding years. ITAT calculated total available cash at Rs. 6,58,443 and reduced the sustained addition from the original amount to Rs. 8,41,557, modifying the CIT(Appeals) order accordingly.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Legality of the order u/s 250 and assessment order u/s 143(3).
2. Addition of Rs. 10,51,950/- u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposits.
3. Charging of interest u/s 234B and 234C.
4. Initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC.

Summary of Judgment:

Issue 1: Legality of the Orders
- The assessee contended that the orders dated 18/12/2023 u/s 250 and 02/02/2019 u/s 143(3) were "illegal and void-ab-initio." However, the Tribunal did not find merit in this ground and upheld the legality of the orders.

Issue 2: Addition u/s 69A for Unexplained Cash Deposits
- The assessee deposited Rs. 15 lacs during the demonetization period, which the A.O. scrutinized. The A.O. found discrepancies in the cash deposits compared to the assessee's historical cash trends and added Rs. 10,51,950/- as unexplained money u/s 69A.
- The CIT(Appeals) upheld this addition, noting the assessee's failure to provide evidence for cash availability beyond Rs. 4,48,050/-. The CIT(Appeals) dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the lack of credible justification for the cash deposits.
- The Tribunal, upon review, partially disagreed with the A.O.'s methodology. It recalculated the cash availability considering gross income and legitimate expenses, determining a revised cash availability of Rs. 6,58,443/-. Consequently, the addition was scaled down to Rs. 8,41,557/-.

Issue 3: Charging of Interest u/s 234B and 234C
- The assessee challenged the interest charged u/s 234B and 234C. The Tribunal noted that charging such interest is "consequential and mandatory." The A.O. was directed to charge interest as per the relevant provisions while giving effect to the appeal order.

Issue 4: Initiation of Penalty Proceedings u/s 271AAC
- The assessee contested the initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC. The Tribunal found this ground "premature and non-appealable," thus requiring no independent adjudication.

Conclusion:
- The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, reducing the addition u/s 69A to Rs. 8,41,557/- and upheld the remaining aspects of the CIT(Appeals) order. The order was pronounced on 05th April, 2024.

---