Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reversal of input tax credit on the ground that the sale transaction was not genuine was sustainable when the movement of goods was accepted and the selling dealer's assessment order showed payment of output tax.
Analysis: The assessment order recorded that the assessee had purchased coffee seeds from the selling dealer during the relevant tax period and that output tax had been paid. The order also noted that the movement of goods was not in dispute. The objection based on later deregistration of the selling dealer failed because the deregistration was approved retrospectively after the relevant assessment year. The plea that the selling dealer did not exist also failed, as the records showed that it was registered with the Commercial Tax Department and had been assessed by the departmental authority.
Conclusion: The reversal of input tax credit was unsustainable and the question of law was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the movement of goods and payment of output tax are established from official records, input tax credit cannot be reversed on speculative doubts about the genuineness of the transaction or on a later retrospective deregistration of the supplier.