Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to anticipatory bail under the proviso to Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 on the ground that he was sick or infirm, aged 83 years, and had cooperated with the investigation.
Analysis: The applicant's claim of sickness and infirmity was examined on the basis of a medical report from a duly constituted Medical Board. The report recorded ischemic heart disease, hypothyroidism, bilateral knee osteoarthritis and lumbar spondylosis, and noted that the morbidities were under control with oral medication but required periodic evaluation. The report also indicated difficulty in movement due to age and osteoarthritis. The record further showed that the applicant had appeared in response to summons on some occasions and that the complaint was filed shortly after his last appearance. In these circumstances, the proviso to Section 45 was treated as enabling judicial discretion in favour of bail where exceptional facts justified it.
Conclusion: The applicant was entitled to anticipatory bail.
Final Conclusion: The application succeeded on the basis that advanced age, medically verified infirmities, and the surrounding procedural circumstances justified release on anticipatory bail under the proviso to Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the proviso to Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, anticipatory bail may be granted in favour of a person who is shown on reliable medical evidence to be sick or infirm, where the circumstances justify a favourable exercise of judicial discretion.