Landmark GST Registration Cancellation Ruling: Fairness Prevails, Retrospective Order Modified with Prospective Effective Date

The HC examined a GST registration cancellation case involving retrospective cancellation without proper reasoning. The court modified the original order, cancelling registration from the current date instead of retrospectively. The petitioner was directed to comply with statutory requirements, and respondents were permitted to pursue tax recovery actions within legal parameters, ensuring procedural fairness and clarity in GST registration cancellation process.

---

---

Issues involved:
The issues involved in this case are the retrospective cancellation of GST registration u/s 29(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, lack of reasons provided for cancellation, and the consequences of retrospective cancellation on input tax credit.

Retrospective Cancellation of GST Registration:
The petitioner challenged the order cancelling their GST registration retrospectively from 02.07.2017. The show cause notice lacked specific reasons for cancellation, merely stating "Others." The impugned order also failed to provide reasons for retrospective cancellation, leading to ambiguity regarding the basis for this decision. The court observed that the order did not qualify as a proper cancellation order as it did not specify any dues against the petitioner and showed nil demand, raising doubts about the validity of the cancellation.

Lack of Reasons for Retrospective Cancellation:
The court noted that both the show cause notice and the impugned order lacked essential details and reasons for the retrospective cancellation of GST registration. This deficiency rendered the notice and order unsustainable, as the petitioner was not given an opportunity to object to the retrospective cancellation. The court emphasized that the proper officer must base the decision to cancel registration retrospectively on objective criteria, rather than mechanical grounds like non-filing of returns.

Consequences of Retrospective Cancellation on Input Tax Credit:
While considering the consequences of cancelling GST registration retrospectively, the court highlighted that such action could impact the input tax credit availed by the taxpayer's customers. The court stressed that registration should only be cancelled with retrospective effect if the consequences are intended and justified. Both the petitioner and the respondent expressed a desire for cancellation, albeit for different reasons.

Modification of the Impugned Order:
Given that the petitioner no longer intended to carry on business and had closed all activities, the court modified the impugned order. The registration was now treated as cancelled from the date of the order, 08.06.2022, rather than retrospectively. The petitioner was directed to comply with the necessary requirements under Section 29 of the CGST Act, 2017. The respondents were permitted to take steps for recovery of any due tax, penalty, or interest, including retrospective cancellation of GST registration, in accordance with the law.

Conclusion:
The petition was disposed of with the modification of the cancellation date and the directive for compliance with statutory obligations. The judgment clarified the rights of the respondents to pursue recovery actions within the legal framework, including retrospective cancellation of GST registration.

---