Rental income from building space with infrastructure classified as other sources under Section 56(2)(iii) not house property

ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on rental income classification, holding that composite lease rental from building space with infrastructure constitutes income from other sources under Section 56(2)(iii), not house property income. The Tribunal followed precedent from earlier assessment years and Delhi HC's Jay Metals decision regarding expense claims under Section 57. However, ITAT rejected the assessee's challenge to Section 143(1) processing disallowances, stating rectification or first appeal are proper remedies. The AO was directed to allow full tax credit after verification.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of assessment orders.
2. Classification of rental income.
3. Adjustments made u/s 143(1) of the Act.
4. Non-granting of full tax credit.
5. Initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 270A.

Summary:

1. Validity of Assessment Orders:
- The assessee challenged the draft and final assessment orders passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre and the Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 16(1), Delhi, as being bad in law and in contravention of section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, grounds no. 1 and 2 were general in nature and were not pressed.

2. Classification of Rental Income:
- Issue: Taxing gross composite rental income of INR 23,67,03,600 under 'Income from House Property' instead of 'Income from Other Sources'.
- Details: The assessee argued that the rental income should be classified under 'Income from Other Sources' based on past tribunal decisions in its favor for AY 2011-12 to AY 2016-17. The Tribunal found force in the assessee's contention, noting that similar issues had been decided in favor of the assessee in earlier years. The Tribunal directed the AO to follow the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Jay Metals regarding the assessee's claim of expenses and depreciation u/s 57 of the Act. Thus, ground no. 3 with its sub-grounds was allowed.

3. Adjustments Made u/s 143(1) of the Act:
- Issue: The addition/disallowance made by the AO while processing the return u/s 143(1) of the Act.
- Details: The Tribunal held that once a scrutiny assessment is framed, the intimation passed u/s 143(1) of the Act goes into oblivion. The remedy for any issues arising from the intimation lies with rectification applications or appeals before the First Appellate Authority. The Tribunal declined to interfere with the findings of the DRP, dismissing ground no. 4 with its sub-grounds but expected the Revenue Authority to consider the assessee's grievance expeditiously.

4. Non-Granting of Full Tax Credit:
- Issue: Non-granting of full tax credit amounting to Rs. 6,88,92,071.
- Details: The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the tax credit of all taxes paid by the assessee for the year under consideration after due verification as per the law. Ground no. 5 was allowed for statistical purposes.

5. Initiation of Penalty Proceedings u/s 270A:
- Issue: The initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 270A of the Act read with section 274.
- Details: The Tribunal found ground no. 6 to be premature and did not decide on it at this stage.

Result:
- The appeal of the assessee for ITA No.- 1483/Del/2022 was partly allowed with specific directions for each issue.
- For ITA No.- 1640/Del/2022, similar issues were raised and adjudicated in line with ITA No.- 1483/Del/2022, leading to a partial allowance of the appeal.

Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 28.03.2024.

---