TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Revenue cannot reopen concluded assessments using Ashish Agarwal judgment as basis for fresh Section 148A proceedings</h1> <h3>Anindita Sengupta Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 61 (1) New Delhi & Ors.</h3> Anindita Sengupta Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 61 (1) New Delhi & Ors. - [2024] 467 ITR 624 (Del) Issues Involved:1. Validity of Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 30 May 2022 issued u/s 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. Validity of the order dated 19 July 2022 disposing of objections u/s 148A(d) of the Act.3. Validity of the consequential notice dated 20 July 2022 issued u/s 148 of the Act for reassessment proceedings for AY 2013-14.Summary:1. Validity of SCN dated 30 May 2022 issued u/s 148A(b):The petitioner challenged the SCN dated 30 May 2022, arguing that the Supreme Court's decision in Ashish Agarwal [(2023) 1 SCC 617] was misinterpreted by the respondents. The petitioner contended that Ashish Agarwal aimed to cure procedural defects in notices issued post-01 April 2021 and did not mandate reopening of reassessment proceedings that had attained finality. The Court noted that the reassessment proceedings initiated on 31 March 2021 had concluded with a final assessment order on 28 March 2022, prior to the Ashish Agarwal judgment. The Court held that Ashish Agarwal did not envisage reopening concluded assessments and the SCN dated 30 May 2022 was thus invalid.2. Validity of the order dated 19 July 2022 disposing of objections u/s 148A(d):The Court observed that the order dated 19 July 2022, which rejected the petitioner's objections, was based on the erroneous assumption that Ashish Agarwal required reopening of concluded cases. The Court emphasized that Ashish Agarwal was concerned with notices issued under the unamended provisions and aimed to salvage reassessment processes without affecting concluded assessments. Consequently, the order dated 19 July 2022 was quashed.3. Validity of the consequential notice dated 20 July 2022 issued u/s 148:The Court held that the notice dated 20 July 2022, initiating reassessment proceedings, was invalid as it stemmed from the misinterpretation of Ashish Agarwal. The Court reiterated that the Supreme Court's directions in Ashish Agarwal did not mandate reopening of concluded assessments. The notice dated 20 July 2022 was thus quashed.Conclusion:The Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the SCN dated 30 May 2022 issued u/s 148A(b), the order dated 19 July 2022 u/s 148A(d), and the notice dated 20 July 2022 u/s 148 of the Act. The Court clarified that Ashish Agarwal did not mandate reopening of concluded assessments and that the respondents had erred in their interpretation of the judgment.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
