Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rectification made under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by bringing to tax salary income received in the USA and consequentially dealing with foreign tax credit and treaty relief, was valid when the assessee was a resident liable on global income and the omission in the return was factual rather than debatable.
Analysis: The assessee had filed the return as a resident/ordinary resident and had claimed foreign tax credit while not disclosing the salary received from JP Morgan, USA in the Indian return. On the facts, the omission of the overseas salary from the return was treated as a factual mistake apparent from the record, not as a debatable issue. The Tribunal therefore accepted the invocation of rectification under section 154. At the same time, it noted the assessee's claim of treaty relief and foreign tax credit, and directed the Assessing Officer to give effect to the first appellate direction and examine the assessee's eligibility under the DTAA after the necessary documents were filed.
Conclusion: The rectification under section 154 was upheld, and the assessee obtained only partial relief in the form of a direction to consider treaty benefits and pass the order giving effect accordingly.